Posts tagged as:

Adaptations

Randy Komisar is a good guy. He’s a Sil­i­con Val­ley CEO. Lis­ten­ing to him speak is like being sat down by your down-to-earth uncle, who wants to give you career advice. Komisar is good at giv­ing inter­est­ing advice about ‘fol­low­ing your pas­sion’ with­out sound­ing trite or overly moti­va­tional.  A lot of us get stuck on ques­tions like “what is my (one) pas­sion in life?!” Rather than wor­ry­ing about the right answer to that ques­tion, he rec­om­mends think­ing of your pas­sions as a port­fo­lio of inter­ests. Then just try to match your inter­ests to the oppor­tu­ni­ties in front of you. As long as you’re mov­ing in the right direc­tion you’re get­ting there.

(If you only have time to watch one of these, watch the first one).

In this sec­ond video, Komisar dis­cusses stay­ing bal­anced. The bal­ance changes as your pri­or­i­ties change. He talks about money, oppor­tu­nity and power (the 3 things peo­ple always wish they had in the career) don’t always come in the same pack­age. We need to be care­ful that our career doesn’t take up too much of our lives and some­times it’s worth it to say, sac­ri­fice money and power in order to increase opportunities.

He also sug­gests that we should never put our­selves in a sit­u­a­tion where we can’t say no, by hand­cuff­ing our­selves to too many oblig­a­tions (i.e. hav­ing too many time or money expenses). Keep your eye on the ball (your val­ues) and, as much as pos­si­ble, give your­self the free­dom to make the changes that respect the balance.

Real­ity check: When Komisar cut back in his life he went from being a full-time CEO to a doing part-time-CEO-temping. He made heaps of money as a CEO and, when he cut back, he made slightly-smaller heaps, but still prob­a­bly more than you and me and every­one who will ever read this post com­bined. It’s eas­ier mak­ing finan­cial sac­ri­fices when doing so doesn’t mean you’ll have to make any real sac­ri­fices at all.

Still, I think he’s giv­ing us some good advice here.

Randy Komisar’s book is The Monk and the Rid­dle: The Edu­ca­tion of a Sil­i­con Val­ley Entre­pre­neur.

{ 2 comments }

Zen TreeInfor­ma­tion is empow­er­ing, but too much can it can also be debil­i­tat­ing.  Infor­ma­tion Over­load costs the U.S. econ­omy $900 bil­lion per year. In this inter­est­ing video a few of the world’s lead­ing man­agers dis­cuss the prob­lem.  In Defense of Dis­trac­tion dis­cusses how our brains are adapt­ing to make the most of the new information-rich envi­ron­ments we live in:

More than any other organ, the brain is designed to change based on expe­ri­ence, a fea­ture called neu­ro­plas­tic­ity. Lon­don taxi dri­vers, for instance, have enlarged hip­pocampi (the brain region for mem­ory and spa­tial processing)—a neural reward for pay­ing atten­tion to the tan­gle of the city’s streets. As we become more skilled at the 21st-century task Meyer calls “flit­ting,” the wiring of the brain will inevitably change to deal more effi­ciently with more infor­ma­tion. The neu­ro­sci­en­tist Gary Small spec­u­lates that the human brain might be chang­ing faster today than it has since the pre­his­toric dis­cov­ery of tools. Research sug­gests we’re already pick­ing up new skills: bet­ter periph­eral vision, the abil­ity to sift infor­ma­tion rapidly.

How­ever, for those of us still strug­gling to keep up, the arti­cle sug­gests meditation:

Neu­ro­sci­en­tists have become obsessed, in recent years, with Bud­dhists, whose atten­tional dis­ci­pline can appar­ently con­fer all kinds of ben­e­fits even on non-Buddhists. (Some psy­chol­o­gists pre­dict that, in the same way we go out for a jog now, in the future we’ll all do daily 20-to-30-minute “sec­u­lar atten­tional work­outs.”) … atten­tion is a lim­ited resource…  our moment-by-moment choice of atten­tional tar­gets deter­mines, in a very real sense, the shape of our lives. Rapt’s epi­graph comes from the psy­chol­o­gist and philoso­pher William James: “My expe­ri­ence is what I agree to attend to.”

{ 2 comments }

Scientific RecipeThe traits of suc­cess­ful peo­ple is a sub­ject that has intrigued us since at least the 1930s. That was the era when Dale Carnegie founded self-improvement indus­try (which now worth $11 Bil­lion per year in the US alone); it was also in the late 1930s that a group of social sci­en­tists qui­etly began the ambi­tious Grant study explor­ing the lives of 268 Harvard-educated men.

Sixty years later (the study still going strong) they have basi­cally given up hope of dis­cov­er­ing the secret recipe of great­ness which they were after. (They also didn’t achieve their other lofty aim of eas­ing “the dishar­mony of the world at large.”) How­ever, they have at least iden­ti­fied seven pri­mary fac­tors that pre­dict healthy (phys­i­cal and psy­cho­log­i­cal) liv­ing and aging. They are: get­ting an edu­ca­tion; hav­ing a sta­ble mar­riage; not smok­ing; employ­ing “mature adap­ta­tions;” not abus­ing alco­hol;  hav­ing some exer­cise and main­tain­ing a healthy weight.

All of these strike me as sur­pris­ingly sim­ple, straight-forward and action­able rec­om­men­da­tions –all but the one. Chal­leng­ing is the con­cept of “adap­ta­tions,” which the study has explored. Adap­ta­tions are the defence mech­a­nisms that peo­ple use to respond psy­cho­log­i­cally to chal­lenges in life:

Vail­lant explains defenses as the men­tal equiv­a­lent of a basic bio­log­i­cal process. When we cut our­selves, for exam­ple, our blood clots—a swift and invol­un­tary response that main­tains home­osta­sis. Sim­i­larly, when we encounter a chal­lenge large or small—a mother’s death or a bro­ken shoelace—our defenses float us through the emo­tional swamp. And just as clot­ting can save us from bleed­ing to death—or plug a coro­nary artery and lead to a heart attack—defenses can spell our redemp­tion or ruin. […]

The health­i­est, or “mature,” adap­ta­tions include altru­ism, humor, antic­i­pa­tion (look­ing ahead and plan­ning for future dis­com­fort), sup­pres­sion (a con­scious deci­sion to post­pone atten­tion to an impulse or con­flict, to be addressed in good time), and sub­li­ma­tion (find­ing out­lets for feel­ings, like putting aggres­sion into sport, or lust into courtship). (The Atlantic arti­cle is avail­able here.)

{ 5 comments }