The new problems of the world require fresh approaches. They require our ingenuity and our careful, creative consideration. You and I know this, but still most of us don’t often get meaningfully involved.
Why is this?
I think there is a collective feeling that these problems are too big for any of us to make a real difference. We doubt our ability to influence important matters when there are well-connected lobbyists, businesses with billion-dollar budgets and political parties firmly wedded to their own notions. And these doubts seem perfectly warrented.
There is a great paragragh in Chomsky’s Manufacturing Consent, about what keeps us from being politically active:
Very few people are going to have the time or the energy or the commitment to carry out the constant battle that’s required to get outside of the [mainstream media]. The easy thing to do you know — you come home from work, you’re tired, you’ve had a busy day, you’re not going to spend the evening carrying on a research project, so you turn on the tube and say its probably right, or you look at the headlines in the paper and then you watch the sports or something. That’s basically the way the system of indoctrination works. Sure the other stuff is there, but you’re going to have to work to find it.
This is the challenge we face. Even if your beef is not with the media, you don’t have the time or the energy for it (whatever that ”it” is for each of us) at the end of the day. We take care of our families, feed our cat, mow the lawn and then there’s not much left over. So, our hard-won university degrees in Geo-Chemistry or Post-Feminist Neocollonialism stare down at us from the wall, while we avoid eye-contact and look for a new episode of the Family Guy.
But the tide is turning my friends
Individuals (as committed, educated and interested as they were) have found the system stacked against them for hundreds of years. It had to do with the challenges of organizing. It was the basis of Marx’s optimism (‘If ONLY we could organize!’) and every major world leader benifited from the fact that they couldn’t. Organizing was very hard.
Back in the day
Consider how hard it was to even share a newspaper article with a friend:
- You had to get your own copy of the newspaper and cut the article out with scissors
- Then, find an envelope
- Then, copy out your friend’s address
- And then get a stamp and go outside to find a place where you can send the letter
It wasn’t THAT hard, but it was hard enough that you probably wouldn’t bother. What WAS hard was forming a group. You would need to get the word out somehow (maybe by letter again) and have a place to meet. It took a considerable amount of time and effort and at least a little funding. The internet has removed a lot of these barriers.
The major challenege to mass-participation for hundreds of years has been the difficulties involved in organizing. I recently finished Clay Shirky’s hugely-underrated Here Comes Everybody,which asks the question: ”what happens when people are given the tools to do things together, without needing traditional organizational structures?” (The mailing a letter example above is adapted from his book).
Today we can group together almost
effortlessly; we can organize and coordinate asynchronously, in muliple groups at the same time –without geographical or financial constraints.
So today it’s mostly a question of leadership. If your vision is strong enough, if your idea is important enough, a lot of us can and will happily join you.
You have the power!
Did you enjoy this article? Subscribe for free by RSS or email and you’ll always know when I publish something new. (What’s RSS?)
{ 0 comments }











































