Today’s graduates face a new breed of challenges as they enter the workforce. They will confront messier, intractable problems such as climate change, global terrorism, antibiotic resistant diseases and persistent market weakness. The same technologies that empowered them as learners at the same time also multiplied the potential for global havoc.
And this has changed the definition of an appropriate education.
Teachers know this
Teachers appreciate that handling the new, intractable problems requires a new skill set. They require empathizing, imaginative citizens –in touch with their own creative impulses, confident individuals who can imagine totally new solutions. Teachers want to facilitate their students’ growth as artists. But teachers know something else as well.
Tomorrow’s managers must also be literate and numerate. As well as being creative leaders, reaching out and finding fresh answers to the problems of the future, they need to know everything we graduated knowing. And they need to be firmer in their foundations than we were. The stakes are higher for them and the competition for jobs is more fierce.
Inside most classrooms today you find teachers taking an iterative approach, balancing the advantages of constancy and routine with their necessity for experimentation and adaptation. You find teachers who are doing the best they can with the resources they have. The demands on teachers have never been greater. And they know it.
Did you enjoy this article?Subscribe for free by RSSor email and you’ll always know when I publish something new. (What’s RSS?)
When I started my better living project it wasn’t really about quality of life at all. It was more about facing the question: “what kind of life is best for a person living in our times?” It was as much about being responsible as anything else. I was worried especially about intractable problems like global terrorism and global warming. Ten years later, terrorism is still a fear, but climate change in particular has emerged as the dominant challenge of our times –our generation’s equivalent of walking on the moon.
Living a good life means making a difference to an important issue like this, or at least doing our best. (We know that the only thing necessary for global problems to persist is for good people to do nothing about them). But, if you’re anything like me, quite frankly as concerned as I am for the environment, I do very little with this conviction. When I make a choice, the effect it has on the environment is rarely foremost in my mind. This dissonance (between what we know is important and how we act) has a lot to do with the complexity of these kinds of issues. It’s hard to know quite how to make any kind of targeted intervention, to make any kind of real difference at all.
Below I’ve listed some practical ways to get involved. But, first here are some great insights into the issue from Bill Gates.
a.a aa
I’ve just taken an online test and found that my personal C02 output every year is about 17 tonnes. This is much higher than I expected. 69% of these emissions come from transportation, which is also surprising considering that, here in Belgium, I don’t drive a car. My emissions simply from flying equals about 10 tons per year. (If you’re interested in what that means, here’s what one tonne of CO2 looks like).
If you’d like to take a test like this here are some you can use: from the EPA (from the US), from ActOnCO2 (from the UK), ICLEI(International).
Small steps for man
The most important thing most of us can do to combat climate is to support (and encourage) government efforts to reduce emissions. Through the government one person, or a small group can make a big difference.
Here area few other things we all do to reduce our carbon footprint:
Reduce the miles you drive (i.e. by walking, cycling, carpooling or taking public transit)
Reduce air travel (i.e. by using electronic communications).
If you do have to drive, purchase a vehicle with the highest fuel efficiency available (and also have it regularly serviced, avoid using the airconditioner, reduce your driving speed and use it as rarely as you can
Plant trees.One tree, planted in the tropics, will absorb about 1 tonne of CO2 if it lives to 40. Considering my 17 tonnes usage per year I will need to plant around 14oo trees in my life to make up the difference. Certain other factors, such as the likelyhood of some of these trees not surviving so long and the ecosystems where I have a chance to plant mean that I should plant at least double that number to ensure I am carbon neutral.
Bill Gates makes the point that a big push to innovate is also necessary. One idea I’d love to be a part of is implementing crowdsourcing methods to innovate solutions to climate change. (Studies have shown that diverse groups of people can often have more success solving really challenging problems than groups of experts.) That seems a logical way to use technologies (which have contributed to the problem) to our advantage.
Did you enjoy this article?Subscribe for free by RSSor email and you’ll always know when I publish something new. (What’s RSS?)
I like people who think design can change the world. Growing up, I was hugely inspired by The Ingenuity Gap –a book which explains why we must be exceptionally creative in our responses to problems like climate change and global terrorism if we are to stand a chance at solving them. Here are two inspiring examples of informed, creative design.
And here is the third TED presentation from Hans Rosling (his others are here and here, if you missed them). Rosling’s non-profit Gap Minder, based in Sweden, uses data visualization (like the Trendalizer) to make the world’s development statistics understandable.